IAR CE deadline: December 31. 84 days left in adopting states. Check what you owe

For asset managers

Research

Research library

Research worth an advisor's time from research firms, asset managers, regulators, central banks, academics and think tanks, each with a short summary in our own words, plus AdvisorIQ's own analysis.

As of Oct 8, 2026, the library lists 2 pieces from research firms on portfolio construction.

Titles marked with an arrow open on the publisher's site. How we choose.

Portfolio construction

2 pieces · More on portfolio construction

  1. Active Fund Manager Success Rates Ticked Up in 2026, but Passive Funds Still Hold the Advantage (opens morningstar.com)

    MorningstarResearch firm

    The midyear Active/Passive Barometer measures how active US funds fared against passive peers in their categories. Just over 40% of active funds survived and beat their passive composite in the year to June 2026, up 7 percentage points, and the cheapest active funds had better odds in most categories.

    Topic: Portfolio constructionmorningstar.com

  2. The Winning Formula for Fund Investors, and Why Others Left Money on the Table (opens morningstar.com)

    MorningstarResearch firm

    Morningstar's annual investor-return study compares what the average dollar in US funds earned with the funds' own returns over the decade through 2025. Investors earned 8.7% a year, about 1.2 percentage points less than the funds, with the widest gaps in more volatile funds and the smallest in allocation funds.

    Topic: Portfolio constructionmorningstar.com

Editorial

How we choose

  • Inclusion is editorial. No publisher pays to be listed, and none can.
  • We leave out any piece that features or recommends a specific fund, ETF, model portfolio or other product.
  • Summaries are AdvisorIQ's own words. We link to the original on the publisher's site rather than copy it.
  • We do not list pieces behind a paywall or a registration form, or pieces from media outlets and advisor platforms; we link to the original source instead.

More in our editorial standards.